(The Conversation is an independent and nonprofit source of news, analysis and commentary from academic experts.)

Bijal Trivedi, The Conversation

(THE CONVERSATION) Editor’s note: As we come to the end of the year, Conversation editors take a look back at the stories that – for them – exemplified 2018.

If you’ve been stunned by all the alarming reports of gene-edited babies, you might have the impression that the only purpose of , the genetic technology that enables biologists to edit DNA, is meddling with the genome. You may be relieved to learn, as I know I was, that engineering traits isn’t so simple. Cecile Janssens of Emory University explains that the most desirable traits are the product of dozens or hundreds of genes interacting with the environment. Such traits can’t be designed by fiddling with a gene or two.

Over the last year of covering CRISPR applications, I’ve come to recognize that a better reflection of the gene- technology’s promise is visible in the labs of scientists creating new varieties of .

1. CRISPR and crops

Given all the controversy associated with genetically modified crops, you might be wondering whether CRISPR is any different. Plant geneticist Yi Li from the University of Connecticut argued that CRISPR’s precision makes it different from GMOs because no foreign genes from other species are added to the plant. Li used CRISPR to engineer citrus trees that are resistant to the greening disease Huanglongbing, which has devastated citrus crops in Florida and other parts of the world.

2. CRISPR and organic farming

Plant pathologist Rebecca Mackelprang of the University of California, Berkeley suggests that some forms of CRISPR editing mimic naturally occurring genetic mutations that arise spontaneously in nature, which means that this biotechnology can actually help meet the goals of organic farming. Furthermore she explains how CRISPR is a way for academic researchers to enter the world dominated by Big Ag.

3. CRISPR and taming wild plants

CRISPR may also be a vital tool as the changing climate makes it difficult to grow crops. Nathan Reem and Esperanza Shenstone of Cornell University explain how wild plants with crop potential can be rapidly domesticated using gene editing. They worked on the groundcherry and showed how the plant could be made to grow more compactly and produce larger fruit. Similar modifications could help struggling crops adapt to warmer conditions. To do the same thing using traditional plant breeding techniques, by comparison, could take hundreds of years.

4. CRISPR and public health

When it comes to public health, there are many useful applications that have nothing to do with editing the DNA of human . Jay Shendure’s team at the University of Washington used CRISPR as a tool to figure out which mutations in the breast cancer genes 1 and 2 – BRCA 1 and BRCA 2 – were harmless and which ones were likely to dramatically raise the risk of breast or ovarian cancer.

. CRISPR and malaria

A more controversial application of CRISPR is engineering a gene drive – a genetic mechanism that helps a trait spread through a population faster than it would naturally. Andrea Crisanti and Kyros Kyrou show how a gene drive can successfully crash a population of mosquitoes in their laboratory. The intended application: wiping out mosquitoes that spread malaria. It’s a radical and irreversible approach – which is why it is still years away from use in the field. But it offers a peek into genetic approaches to controlling this and other mosquito-borne diseases.

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article here: http://theconversation.com/crispr-isnt-just-for-editing-human-embryos-it-also-works-for-plants-and-bugs-5-essential-reads-108904.



Source link https://www.sfchronicle.com/news/article/CRISPR-isn-t-just-for-editing-human-embryos-it-13483950.php

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here